4 Responsed To This Post
Subscribes to this topic Comment RSS or TrackBack URL
mygif_alt
newmspguy Says, on 6-19-2008 at 15:31:31     

Mike. I was waiting with anticipation for this post! I like the analysis a lot. What really struck me in your post was the fact that SMB’s are buying services from the telcos even though they offer a lower level of service. Two things come to mind:

1. Do they not realize they will get lower level of service and thus are lured by the lower prices?

2. Is it that the telco’s offer a service that is boxed up and ready to go and then really easy to deliver?

Maybe it’s both things. I just can’t help but think that somehow service has to have a role here and when you do something extrodinary for a customer - they pay for it and they also stay your customer.

mygif
Scott Cover Says, on 6-19-2008 at 16:34:55     

I’m a very firm believer in making sure the client is the right one. I actually went so far as to setup a referral relationship with a couple of Consulting Companies in the area for a percentage of revenue if the client isn’t the right fit for our services.

We actually require that a customer takes our basic managed package in order to do business with us. We have very healthy margins on our basic managed packages, and even with a relatively small client base of 50-100 clients all only using our basic managed package, I can make a very good living off of it, while still paying a sales person to do all the work for me.

Being a multi-million dollar a year business would be nice, and I’ll work towards that goal for sure, but if I can make a solid and dependable multi-6 figure income a year, who am I to complain?

mygif_alt
nvossburg Says, on 6-19-2008 at 22:31:04     

Mike,

Thanks for continuing the discussion about scaling MSPs in the SMB market, discussions like this help mature our industry as a whole.

I agree with your conclusions about big business and scalability of service/product offerings. However, I think your conclusions for our industry contradict the sales strategy of big business. Being very selective about whom you bring on as a customer so that they fit a specific mold does not address the challenge of scaling your service. Verizon does not discriminate against its customer base, with the possible exception of credit checks. Instead, any customer is allowed to sign up for a service or product and self-select whether that service or product works for them.

A flawed service model by many service providers in our industry creates the issue of scalability. Most providers equate Managed Services to offering unlimited support. This causes a number of problems for MSPs for service and scalability:

1) Diminishing Value of Service. If the quantity of a product or service is unlimited, then simple laws of supply and demand will dictate that the value of that product or service lowers to almost zero. How many fine dining restaurants feature all you can eat buffets? If a customer is entitled to unlimited support then what incentive does the customer have to address the reasons why support issues originate?

Many providers place requirements to address abuse from a client such as maintaining warranties, keeping rotation schedules, having software maintenance and support contracts but this doesn’t address user related issues nor does it address investments in IT outside of required maintenance. Of course there are our dream customers that value IT and have the budgets to back up their demands, from our experience this does not represent the majority of the SMB market. A SMBs priority is the delivery of their own products/services and investment is allocated to expanding or maintaining their own efforts, which sometimes includes IT.

2) Who has ownership? A Managed Service Provider is contracted to manage and support a client’s infrastructure but they still lack ownership of the client’s infrastructure. Ultimately, it’s the business owner that calls the shots on his or her own investments. The reason you cannot scale unlimited support offerings is because of ownership.

We are supporting end users that were not trained and educated by our staff, software platforms that were developed by a third party, hardware manufactured by a third party, and environmental conditions of which we have no control over. Do Enterprise IT departments allow branch offices to make their own decisions about IT investments? Very rarely, and if they do its generally for end user equipment. When the customer owns the equipment, hosts the infrastructure, and controls the budget they have the ownership.

Most providers end up playing the law of averages, hoping that their contract requirements reduce the cumulative support needs of their clients to a sum less than the revenue generated by the total sum of the contracts. There is an industry that does this, its called insurance…

We flirted with idea of creating a symbiotic relationship with our clients by offering ownership of a client’s environment in exchange for a % of revenue or starting a non-profit cooperative within a specific vertical segment that would pool the needs and funds of a vertical to provide infrastructure, development, and support to the industry. These ideas ultimately failed getting of the drawing board because there is a huge issue of trust and transparency.

So how would you scale our industry? How can you design a system that’s so scalable that customers can signup from a website?

We think it has everything to do with the ownership question. Why does an SMB need their own infrastructure in the age of virtualization, cloud computing, cheap bandwidth, and evolving workplace cultures that are embracing telecommuting and flexible work schedules/locations? Isn’t this something that would be better left in the hands of a business that specializes in providing the right infrastructure, software, and services for the right price?

Would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks again for keeping the debate going!

mygif
Mike Says, on 6-20-2008 at 14:21:35     

Great comments everyone - thanks for the discussion! A few thoughts:

I believe the bigger companies have success selling the services they are selling for a few reasons:

1. The packages are very defined and do deliver an understandable value.

2. The large companies are usually selling a small dollar value service to a lot of companies, versus most of us are selling a relatively larger dollar value to a relatively smaller number of companies.

3. Both of the above make for services that are relatively easy to package and sell, and they have huge dollars to do both.

I COMPLETELY agree with nvossburg’s assessment of the current and future state of the industry. Most customers would love to not need to own any of their own infrastructure, and most in our industry would love to be able to deliver a solution that allows us to maintain ownership/control of the entire infrastructure. Sounds like a good fit!

The will result in solutions that are much easier to market and sell and will require MUCH LESS SERVICE in order to deliver and support them.

If you wonder if this is actually true, go take a look at any hosting environment. See how standardized and straightforward it is to support, and you’ll get a glimpse at the future of our industry as well.

The good news is, this isn’t far away, and we don’t have to wait to be able to start this process for our businesses. I agree that we can make a nice income doing what we are currently doing, but the market is going to shift quickly and you don’t want to be left behind. By starting with a few basic offerings that truly deliver a “technology as a service” instead of just providing “service to their technology”, you can start to shift how your customers perceive the value of what you are offering and creaete some easy to sell, high margin offerings.

Mike

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)

Inform me when someone post new message here

Please Note: Comments Moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment