2 Responsed To This Post
Subscribes to this topic Comment RSS or TrackBack URL
mygif_alt
Susan Says, on 7-10-2009 at 01:56:01     

“Under this decision, losses from the two businesses could offset salary or investment income earned by both.”

The case is about allowing someone to offset salary income.

This is about passive income loss rules being applied to LLCs. If you are active in both businesses you are not impacted by this ruling and would be able to offset that loss by that income.

Passive investment rules are applied only when you are not actively involved in the business. Most entrepreneuers I know are active.

mygif
Mike Says, on 7-11-2009 at 00:14:17     

Actually…I don’t believe that’s the case here. The argument made by the entrepreneurs in this case is that they are actively working in both businesses but should still be able to offset income in one with losses in another. It’s about active…not passive. That’s why it’s such a big deal.

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)

Inform me when someone post new message here

Please Note: Comments Moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment